So, yesterday I found this article on the NYT blogs about how “parents, educators and addiction experts would react” to the multiple scenes of drinking in the new Harry Potter movie. It seemed pretty silly to me yesterday, and after seeing the movie last night, I’m downright flummoxed. Apparently the big fuss is that Harry, Hermione, and Ron go to a pub, have a “butterbeer”* or two, and relax sufficiently that Hermione puts her arm around both boys on the way back to Hogwarts.
Hermione, you drunken slut.
Honestly, what a fuss over nothing! If you’re a serious temperance advocate, go ahead and tell your kid that butterbeer is nonalcoholic, like root beer or ginger beer. Because whether you drink or not, getting away from the daily grind with your friends for a few hours will relax you. At this point in the movie, the trio desperately needs a break from the romantic, scholastic, athletic, and oh-by-the-way-Death-Eaters-are-trying-to-kill-the-world tensions that Hogwarts has come to represent. Of course they’re going to be in a more laid-back mood after a day trip to Hogsmeade. Booze isn’t the point at all.
The other objection is that teachers are seen drinking, apparently. Not so’s you’d notice, or at least not so’s I noticed, but some folks did, and they’re not happy about it. I hope they realize that if they do not want their children to be aware that professors drink, they had better avoid exposing them to any British or American literature published after World War II. They might also want to avoid exposing their children to higher education itself.
But here’s the kicker–for all the tempest in a butterbeer stein about booze, why hasn’t anyone pointed out that the entire first half of the movie is about drugs? It’s sort of unavoidable when your new main character is a Potions Master. Harry psychs Ron up for the big Quidditch match by making him believe that he’s been dosed with magic steroids, and then takes the drug–oh, sorry, “potion”–himself later in the movie. Love potions are all over the place. And the new Potions Master is not only found sneaking around the school’s “herb garden,” he knows the precise street value of certain highly valuable leaves!
If you’re going to get upset about anything, get upset about that. Because the movie doesn’t portray alcohol as doing anything other than relaxing you for an hour or so. Booze doesn’t work in the Harry Potter universe. Drugs, however, do. If the movie does have a message about substance use, it’s rather clear: Boozers are losers. What you want to do is learn how to grow and mix your own.
Now, honestly, I don’t care about any of this. I’m not a puritan about drug and alcohol use, and I’m certainly not a subscriber to the notion that all children’s entertainment must be scrubbed squeaky clean lest the child Get Ideas. (If I were taking a kid of my own to the movie, a little Miss Conduct Jr., I’d be doing a debriefing afterward, for sure. Not about the chemical substances, but about why it’s really not a good idea to fall in love with a lazy, cowardly, self-centered fellow who can’t succeed in anything without your help and then resents you for helping him. If it were a little Mr. Improbable Jr., he’d be getting the lecture on why men with quiet courage, little ego, and no fear of looking nerdy–you know, like his father, or Neville Longbottom–are the real men to be looked up to and emulated.) But if you’re going to make a big fuss about nothing, at least make a big fuss about the right nothing, eh?
*A “butterbeer,” Muggles, is a mildly alcoholic beverage, kind of like what we Kansans call “3-2 beer.” I’m sure this is what magic folk would call it, too, if they weren’t too stupid to do math. The only creatures ever known to get actually drunk from butterbeer are house elves, who are approximately a third the size of humans and have severely compromised free will to begin with.

Subscribe to Miss Conduct
16 Comments to 'Harry Potter and the Big Fuss over Nothing'
July 29, 2009
Slightly off the main topic, but your hate-on for Ron Weasley is totally delightful to me. I thought about it through the whole movie.
July 29, 2009
Oh, God, I hate Ron Weasley SO MUCH and I think he and Hermione are going to have one of those marriages where the woman brings in 2/3 of the income and does 100% of the housework and emotional work in the relationship (it will be Hermione who’s in charge of remembering and buying appropriate gifts for all the Weasley in-laws) and still blames herself that her husband drinks too much and can’t hold down a job.
Ginny and Harry, on the other hand, are going to have a great relationship. She’ll support him and be strong enough to take the back seat and be the “Chosen One’s” wife when that’s her role, and he’ll show up to all her Quidditch games and read all her articles. Sometimes they’ll argue about her sports reporting (she’ll be more biased in favor of her old team than she wants to admit, and he’ll have to call her on that), and sometimes she’ll need to take him down a peg (“I thought you were edging just a bit too close to Gilderoy Lockhart territory at the class reunion tonight, dear”), but they’re going to do okay.
July 30, 2009
I actually spent much of my time at the last movie wondering WHY Hermione wanted to be with Ron. (I wondered while reading the book too.) I especially wondered why she would want to be with him when there was a better person right in front of her – that is, Harry. I mean, okay that she doesn’t want to be with Harry, but why Ron?
And after reading what you wrote above, I am wondering what a Hermione-Neville ending would be like.
July 30, 2009
So what if butterbeer is alcoholic?
Hermione goes to a public house with two boys she can literally trust with her life. She has ONE drink – there are professors there, and she doesn’t want to embarrass herself, and besides, Rosemerta wouldn’t overserve anyone. She gets a bit merry, but when there’s danger on the *walk* (not drive) back, she snaps right to high alert.
That’s EXACTLY the behavior I would want any sixteen year old to emulate, much better than the “binge ’til you puke” model in most teen romps. This is what people complain about? If I were watching with young teens, I’d *emphasize* that they were drinking beer.
July 30, 2009
Laura, that is a BRILLIANT point. It hadn’t occurred to me what a good model of responsible drinking that scene actually is!
Umana, I’ve been a Hermione/Neville ‘shipper for years! The lack of chemistry between her and Harry never bothered me–my best friend is a (VERY straight) guy and we have a relationship that’s quite similar to H&H. In fact, I laughed out loud at the library scene where (I forget which one of them it is) asks the other one to a party on the grounds that since neither of them can have the date they want, they might as well go together. My friend and I have had a few “dates” like that.
Neville, though–he’s scholarly, like Hermione, and so, so brave. I liked that she made Mad-Eye stop the Cruciatus curse because she could tell it was upsetting him. And wasn’t he about the only one who acted halfway adult during the whole Yule Ball fiasco? Took rejection gracefully and kept asking new girls until he got a date, and then actually bothered to learn how to ballroom dance so he’d be a GOOD date? Plus, remember that Hermione had to put a memory spell on her parents and emigrate them to Australia. She and Neville can share the pain of having-but-not-having parents. Has Ron EVER asked about her feelings, or done anything for her?
July 30, 2009
I saw the post about Alcohol and Harry Potter in the NYT the other day and had the same reaction-making a mountain out of a molehill or what?
What *did* bother me was the preview of the movie “2012″ that they showed before Harry Potter-I’m not sure if you saw that or not. It was unbelievably disturbing-tied in with the myth of the Mayan calendar ending in 2012 and the world coming to an end. My 12 year old was in tears the day after thinking about it. To me, that’s what we should be avoiding having our kids see-not some kids drinking a beverage that may or may not be alcoholic.
Just sayin’…
July 30, 2009
I did see that, PJ, and I was appalled. Mr. Improbable and the Fabulous Bureaucrat all but had to physically restrain me from yelling, “There’s not going be an apocalypse in 2012 unless [insert certain politician's name here] gets elected! The world’s not going to end because some freakin’ pre-Columbian death cult ran out of calendar!” I’m sure had your child been in the theater he would have been far more terrified of me than of the preview. (It was a hot day. I was cranky.)
Here’s a nice takedown on all that nonsense, btw: http://www.slate.com/id/2218841/pagenum/all/#p2
July 30, 2009
That Hermione one-liner resulted in one of my funniest-sounding laughs of all time! And now, I’d like to add some HP nerd thoughts:
Everyone’s made great points about explaining drinking to the kids; might I also point out that they are British, anyway? So IF J.K. Rowling wrote her series in accordance with British laws, the Hogsmeade gang isn’t exactly engaging in underaged drinking in THEIR country. The series was set in the early 90′s anyway (though the movies aren’t!), a time when the rules may have been more lenient than the following:
Da Rules: Young people aged 16 or 17 can drink beer, wine or cider with a meal if it is bought by an adult and they are accompanied by an adult. It is illegal for this age group to drink spirits in pubs even with a meal.
In Scotland, 16 and 17 year olds can buy beer, wine or cider so long as it’s served with a meal and consumed in an area used solely for eating meals.
Since Hogwarts is “north” we can assume that it is in Scotland (where thy originally filmed Hogwarts Castle) and thus the Harry Potter characters don’t need adult supervision. Even though, of course, they have all their professors nearby. I got nothing on the “meals” bit of the law… maybe their plates magically vanished from the scene??
I must also agree that “end of the world” movies evoke the same response in me (and a bit of stress – who wants to think about that???). It kind of makes me wonder how they’re going to end the film, though.
July 30, 2009
I wonder if Hermione is attracted to Ron because he’s a “fixer-upper” project. Besides, she gets entry into a big (and quite sweet) wizard family, which could be attractive to an only child from muggle parents.
Anyway, Robin, I would imagine that after the fall of the Nazis… I mean the Death Eaters, that Hermione could go get her parents again. Australia isn’t a black hole, no matter how it sometimes smells.
Now I’m imagining a sequel, about 5 years after the Epilog, wherein Hermione starts having an affair with Neville, and then the two of them embark on some dangerous wizardly to try to restore his parents to sanity at last.
July 31, 2009
Now for some odd reason, I always wanted Neville to live happily after after with Luna. Hermione’s not happy unless she’s being challenged, and Ron is definitely a challenge.
July 31, 2009
Bethany–boy, there’s a glass-half-full for you: at least “2012″ has pretty much written itself out of having a sequel. I hope. Please.
Dmajor–according to JKR, Hermione does eventually retrieve her parents. Also, being the only child of Muggle parents is hardly the worst thing in the world. As an only child and convert to Judaism, I *certainly* wouldn’t (and didn’t) marry the Jewish equivalent of Ron Weasley in order to have a Big Fat Jewish Family with Tevye as my father-in-law!
Veronica–ugh! LIFE is enough of a challenge. Your partner should help you cope with it, not be the challenge him/herself! I don’t think you’re the only one who picked up on the Neville/Luna vibe. I don’t imagine them married, they’re both very emotionally self-sufficien. More like friends with benefits whenever she’s in town investigating something for the Quibbler.
July 31, 2009
Perhaps the Hermiones of the world find the Rons so attractive because of the yearning to be able to conduct one’s life so devil-may-care. It just may be a more balanced relationship than anyone could think. She helps him fly a little straighter, he teaches her to let go a little. In 20 years, will she be wishing she’d studied harder for potions, or still laughing about the time they blew off homework and had a delightful time in Hogsmeade?
July 31, 2009
But the main reason Ron is able to be so devil-may-care is because Hermione does about half his homework FOR him.
August 1, 2009
I never thought that the Ron-Hermione relationship inspired so much debate amongst readers. Perhaps Ron was babied too much. Molly does tend to see him as the baby of the family. I don’t want to blame Molly, but we are a product of our environments. Perhaps if Ron was ALLOWED to fail instead of being rescued, things would be different. He didn’t even pass his driver’s test legitimately, he magicked his way out of it. I suppose there’s one in every family, muggle and wizard.
August 1, 2009
“I suppose there’s one in every family, muggle and wizard.”
Truest statement ever, and I got the best laugh of the day out of it!
August 3, 2009
Thank you Robin and commenters for making my Monday morning! It is comforting to know that I’m not the only “adult” that considers these things…
I haven’t read the article, so can’t comment on it specifically, but butterbeer has been around in all of the books and movies, so I’m not sure why this is an “issue” to people now. I hadn’t considered that Hermione acted “drunk” until I read it here. I think she was relaxed and happy to be with her two bff’s, thinking (incorrectly as it turns out) that there is no pending Death Eater danger.
As far as the Ron/Hermione pairing, I never got it either, but there are people in my own life that I would have never in a million years have put together that are living quite happy lives. I, too, like the Neville/Luna match. I finished Deathly Hallows, again, a few weeks ago, and I didn’t love the ending, again. Not sure how I would have liked to end it, though . . .
Leave a comment