Workin’ on a link farm
Trying to raise my hit rate
Plowing through my RSS
Pokin’ your posts.
Yes, I’m feeling silly. It’s Monday, I’m allowed! Besides, I’m married to the only Baby Boomer in North America who does not think “Spinal Tap” is funny. I have to work it in when I can.
Links!
First of all, tonight is the first night of Passover — and apparently the President and First Lady will be celebrating. I like it. Passover is probably the most universal of the Jewish holidays, and except in ultra-Orthodox circles (I assume), it’s very common for Jewish families to invite non-Jews to share in their celebrations. I also like that the first seder in the White House happened under the administration of the first African-American President and First Lady. If anyone has the right to the Exodus story in this country, it is African-Americans who, like Michelle Obama, are the descendants of slaves. Chag sameach, Mr. and Mrs. Obama.
And speaking of matters faith-related, check out this fascinating article: “Is Hearing God Like Being a Skilled Athlete?” Without making any claims for or against the existence of God, the article looks into the capacity for religious experience, and how that capacity is developed.
From God to dog: an excellent resource on why the “dominance theory” practiced by Cesar Millan, et al., is misguided and potentially harmful. Lots of good advice here. Thanks to Vera Wilkinson at The Cooperative Dog for the link. (You can become a fan of The Cooperative Dog on Facebook, and Vera posts some terrific stuff — a nice mix of the fun and the educational.)
In more doggie news, this headline from the Sacramento Bee may seem odd on the surface: “UC Davis Study Shows Dogs Can Help Youngsters Read,” but the story itself is quite nice. Apparently kids who have problems reading aloud improve significantly if they can read to an attentive, affectionate, yet wholly nonjudgmental audience: dogs!
“Avatar” is apparently the film I am most interested in talking about, and least interested in seeing, this year. Here’s another article that addresses the points some commenters were making about the appeal of the film being partly in its evocation of how biologists see the world. I don’t agree with all the writer’s points, but it’s intriguing nonetheless.
And here’s one article I do agree with, by Peter Straub, about genre and, specifically, horror. As you all have probably figured out by now, I am a great horror fan, and have always found particularly annoying the notion that 1) there is something psychologically wrong about wanting to read horror, and 2) horror isn’t “real” literature. Mr. Straub lays the smack down. (And perhaps later on I’ll discuss in more detail why I’ve been on a particular horror kick lately.)
In addition to being a horror fan, I am also a girly girl. Which is why I am annoyed with the “Pink Stinks” campaign. We don’t empower women by disparaging femininity. This campaign reminds me of a bizarre incident that happened when I was a college professor: another instructor complimented me on the sweater I was wearing, and asked what color it was. I replied, trying very hard not to look at her as though she’d lost her mind, “It’s pink.” I mean, this sweater was flat-out Pepto-Bismol pink, no possible option of “light red” or “dusty rose” or “burnt peach” about it. My colleague immediately replied, “Oh, it can’t be pink, it’s too nice!” Clearly, she had such a negative mental image of pink that the idea of an independent, intellectual, professional woman dressed in the color was literally unimaginable to her, even as I stood before her in all my peppermint glory. (Here is another article on pink, by a delightful writer I met at the New Haven event.)
This article in the New York Times has haunted me, though it gives no real answers. But we have all known people determined to sabotage their success through whatever means, people who define themselves by their failures, their resentments, their illnesses, their weaknesses.
Finally, I’ve been meaning for some time to write an ode to my new favorite television show, “Parks & Recreation.” Procrastinate long enough, and someone else will do it for you! You can ignore the inside-baseball aspect of whether Leslie Knope is a “good feminist” or not, and focus on the rest of the entry. So many sitcoms today are based on cynicism and the cringe factor, including the increasingly unwatchable “The Office.” “Parks & Recreation” is about people who genuinely care about their jobs, each other, and their beliefs, but it completely avoids sentimentality. It’s darned smart, too: a recent episode took on the liberal versus libertarian positions on food policing, in a way that made a good argument for both sides, and all this in 23 minutes of television that included a B and C plot. Not bad.